NY Times Story PROVES Saddam Was Making Nuclear Bomb

By Cepan Comments (4) / Email this page » / Leave a comment »

New York TImes Story PROVES Saddam Was Making A Nuclear Bomb

The New York Times, in a weak attempt at an October/November election surprise, released a story tonight that tries to say the Republicans let people see how to build a nuclear bomb on the Internet.

What is DOES do is prove that Saddam and Iraq were a real threat to the United States by trying to build a nuclear bomb themselves, why else would they have the plans for a bomb?

The federal government set up a web site this past March to show the world the 48,000 boxes of documents captured during the war in Iraq that were from Saddam’s secret files. This would allow Arabic experts to decode and read the secret files and let the government know what files were important and which pertained to Weapons Of Mass Destruction.

Some of these files show diagrams and plans for building a nuclear bomb. Not in complete detail though, and missing key elements. But enough to cause a stir among the liberal media interested only in attacking Republicans.

The web site with these has been taken down since the NY Slimes story ran to make sure the documents on it are safe to release, but the ENTIRE NY Slimes articles has the unintended purpose of PROVING that Saddam was trying to build a Nuclear Bomb!

The paper writes:

Among the dozens of documents in English were Iraqi reports written in the 1990’s and in 2002 for United Nations inspectors in charge of making sure Iraq abandoned its unconventional arms programs after the Persian Gulf war. Experts say that at the time, Mr. Hussein’s scientists were on the verge of building an atom bomb, as little as a year away.

European diplomats said this week that some of those nuclear documents on the Web site were identical to the ones presented to the United Nations Security Council in late 2002, as America got ready to invade Iraq. But unlike those on the Web site, the papers given to the Security Council had been extensively edited, to remove sensitive information on unconventional arms.
The deletions, the diplomats said, had been done in consultation with the United States and other nuclear-weapons nations. Mohamed ElBaradei, the director of the International Atomic Energy Agency, which ran the nuclear part of the inspections, told the Security Council in late 2002 that the deletions were “consistent with the principle that proliferation-sensitive information should not be released.”

This is the big news to the NY Slimes, that the stuff should not have been released…NOT the news that this proved Saddam was building a Nuclear Bomb.

Here’s more proof:

On Sept. 20, the site posted a much larger document, “Summary of technical achievements of Iraq’s former nuclear program.” It runs to 51 pages, 18 focusing on the development of Iraq’s bomb design. Topics included physical theory, the atomic core and high-explosive experiments."

So while the NY Slimes and the mainstream liberal media will try and make this about secret documents being released to Iran and the world, it is really PROOF that Iraq and Saddam were dangerous and close to a nuclear bomb.

In Matworld we see the proof as what it is, not what the loons want it to be.

Thank God the Republicans made the government release the secret files in the 48,000 boxes. Now America can see just how dangerous Iraq was.

MTI

Cepan@aol.com

The Liberal Bible just told its believers to stick it, albeit inadvertently. This gives us so much ammo. Let's hope Rove proves his mettle in the next 4 days!

Go Rove! Use this against em'!

I E-mailed Bill O'Reilly, Sean Hannity, and Brit Hume on Fox News about this article--I hope they pick up on it.

Imagine, the New York Times publishing an October (or early November) Surprise that actually helps Republicans!

But maybe they have an ulterior motive. If the Republicans keep the majority, they can sell lots of newspapers in liberal NYC beating up on the GOP for the next two years. If the Democrats win, they won't have anybody to kick around anymore, and sales might go down.

This could be huge, and save our majority--hopefully, the word can get out in time!

The bad news: Conservatism is hard to sell. The good news is that it works.

Good call by HeavyM

I just posted in the other story about this that we needed to e-mail blitz all the news shows with this article and what it means. They may pick up on it and run it with some semblance of truth instead of the NYT slant.

--------
Sometimes the hardest thing and the right thing are the same. -The Fray, "All At Once"

...for putting that information on the web? Yadda, yadda, yadda about letting terrorists know how to make a nuclear trigger, etc. They don't use the Internet! They don't even have computers, and if they do, I imagine they are dial-up and wouldn't have waited for the documents to download. (Ever try to access documents from a government website through a 28.8 modem? I'd have shot myself many times before I got DSL if suicide wouldn't have led to a after-life of eternal pain.)

I want to thank the Rick Santorums and Curt Weldons and whoever else pressured the administration to release the fact that Iraq was on the verge of making a nuclear weapon--we have found the WMDs! They would have been found in the form of mushroom clouds over our cities in 2003. Thank you, Mr. President, for having the foresight to know!

And thanks to the idiot NY Times for pointing out to us that we apparently found them before this past March but holding that information in a November surprise that has clearly backfired.

Take that, liberals--and to you, Miss Nancy Pelosi, I hope you can get your deposit back on the drapes!

 
Redstate Network Login:
(lost password?)


©2008 Eagle Publishing, Inc. All rights reserved. Legal, Copyright, and Terms of Service